|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 27/08/2012 08:42 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> FWIW, I use VirtualBox on Linux pretty much daily, never have stability
> problems at all.
You never had it pop up and say "This process has performed an illegal
operation and must be terminated. Do you wish to send an error report"?
(Oh, well, I guess you wouldn't be seeing a Windows-specific error
message on Linux... But you get what I'm saying.)
You never had a VM working perfectly, and then the next day VirtualBox
utterly /refuses/ to start that VM? (Like, you click "start", and either
nothing happens or VirtualBox instantly crashes.)
You never had it refuse to delete a snapshot for no defined reason?
(E.g., you have a VM powered down, you take a snapshot, realise you
wanted to do something first, go to delete the snapshot you just made,
and it says "sorry, I can't do that Dave".)
> I'm also not sure what you mean by "manag[ing] disks and VMs separately"
> - the GUI that I use (which is the default GUI AFAIK) doesn't do that.
When you create a VM, it asks to create a virtual disk. (Which isn't
surprising; VMware does this also.) But it seems to want to put all the
VM files in one place, and all the virtual disk files in another place.
And it asks me if I want to reuse one of my existing disk files. (Why
would I *ever* want to do that??) And when I delete a VM, this does
/not/ delete the disk image files with it. I have to manually do that
from the disk management window.
Maybe the GUI is completely different on Linux or something. But on
Windows, you can't even edit a snapshot description while the VM it
belongs to is running. (I can understand, from a technical perspective,
how that could end up not working. What I can't figure out is why the
heck nobody has fixed this. It can't be that damned hard...)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |