Am 16.08.2012 13:13, schrieb Invisible:

> More to the point, most of the questions above aren't about the language
> itself, they're about all the supporting infrastructure that goes with a
> language to make it useful. While these are obviously important things,
> they aren't part of the core language.

YES, EXACTLY! So much for the "solution to everything".

> In summary: If you're saying that C# has better tools and better
> libraries for doing real-world stuff, then I have no argument. If you're
> saying that the C# language design is superior, then I must disagree.

The point is, if it's the right tool for the right job, its design /is/ 
superior (for this job).

Design superiority isn't in elegant simplicity, but in how actually 
useful it is - for a given purpose.

Post a reply to this message