Am 14.08.2012 23:06, schrieb Orchid Win7 v1:

> Perhaps actual /strings/ allow storing all possible Unicode code-points.
> However, char, the type of a single character, apparently covers the BMP
> only. If you're going to go to all the trouble of actually supporting
> Unicode, why not support the whole thing?

Do you have any idea what "the whole thing" means in case of Unicode?

Hint: There's more to Unicode than just ~1 million code points with 
glyphs mapped to some of them.


> Pop quiz: if x is a string and y is a delegate, does it do delegate
> concatenation or string concatenation?

Provided it doesn't raise an error, obviously you'll get string 
concatenation, because you can't convert strings to delegates.

Post a reply to this message