>> Still, if it's as trivial as you claim to have multiple TB of RAM back
>> in 1995, why didn't they do that?
>
> I don't think anyone said it was "trivial" - just "possible".
>
> Neither of those implies "cheap" or "desirable in all circumstances"
> either.

I said "why would you want a 140GB heap when it's impossible to have 
that much RAM?"

And everyone was like "OMG, are you kidding? Of COURSE you can have 
hundreds of GB of RAM. EVERYBODY does this ALL THE TIME for EVERYTHING! 
If your company doesn't do this then they're just being cheap."

Post a reply to this message