|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:35:48 +0100, Invisible wrote:
> Still, if it's as trivial as you claim to have multiple TB of RAM back
> in 1995, why didn't they do that?
I don't think anyone said it was "trivial" - just "possible".
Neither of those implies "cheap" or "desirable in all circumstances"
either.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |