|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:14:04 -0400, Francois Labreque wrote:
>> The predicted Y2K computing technology disaster is what failed to
>> happen. Planes failed to fall from the sky, the power grid failed to
>> fail, the phones kept working.
>>
>>
> Mostly because most companies took it seriously enough that they fixed
> the problems that could have happened.
>
> some small businesses did have problems, for example:
Sure, there were some relatively minor issues.
There were predictions (whether or not they were /serious/ predictions is
certainly debatable) of massive outages and a return to the dark ages or
the stone ages.
But I never took those very seriously myself. But people who were less
well-informed (and not working in the tech industry) certainly did think
things would be much worse than they were.
My coauthor and I joked about getting into the long-haul trucking
business if everything croaked. Of course, we knew it was highly
unlikely (and if it happened the way the doomsayers were, long-haul
trucking would've have been a particularly good business because there
are a lot of computers involved in that business - not just to keep the
trucks running, either, but for the whole supply chain management side of
things.)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |