POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.off-topic: How should a ReplyTo: be handled by an OutOfOffice message?: Re: How should a ReplyTo: be handled by an OutOfOffice message?

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : How should a ReplyTo: be handled by an OutOfOffice message? : Re: How should a ReplyTo: be handled by an OutOfOffice message?		Server Time 29 Jul 2024 02:26:59 EDT (-0400)

From: clipka
Date: 18 Jul 2012 17:40:05
Message: <50072d35$1@news.povray.org>

Am 18.07.2012 21:13, schrieb andrel:
> I am using a number of different e-mails. Sometimes I find it useful to
> supply a ReplyTo: field. At our hospital e-mail is handled by a
> Outlook2010 server, that will send out of office messages to the From:
> field address and not the ReplyTo: . Today I noticed that also another
> mail server (type unknown) does this. Anyone know if this behaviour is
> correct, permitted, or a bug?

 From RFC 5322 (emphasis added):
--------------------------------------------------------
    [...] When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it
    indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message SUGGESTS
    that replies be sent.
--------------------------------------------------------

Post a reply to this message