On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:16:23 +0200, clipka wrote:

> Am 16.07.2012 16:41, schrieb Jim Henderson:
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:50:12 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>
>>> I literally can't think of any way to get Google to figure this out
>>> automatically.
>>
>> It's a good thing you aren't having a problem working it out
>> figuratively, then.
>>
>> But a generic example is difficult to help you with.  Can you be
>> specific about what you're trying to find, and then someone maybe can
>> help you phrase it so it works?
> 
> I guess it wasn't really a request for help, more like another episode
> of "Random Rants".

Perhaps, but one way to answer a "random rant" or for a "random rant" to 
be more than just ignored is to have specificity in the rant.

Jim

Post a reply to this message