>> Heh. So standard Haskell obviously sucks as much as Java without generics.
>
> Why exactly would you need generics in order to make a list of different
> shapes? (Being able to do such a thing is kind of the very definition of
> object-oriented programming.)

No, I think he means that I said Java sucks because of X, so he's saying 
Haskell sucks because of Y. There isn't any particular relationship 
between these things...

[At least, I /think/ that's what he meant...]

Post a reply to this message