On 6/24/2012 19:05, clipka wrote:
> To me this actually makes some sense.

It's a bit over my head, but I don't think saying "the math that describes 
THIS is the same as the math that describes THAT, therefore they're the same 
thing" really works.

Heck, that's what confused people into talking about "wave particle duality" 
in the first place.

Plus, the math he's talking about is pretty straightforward, so it's not 
surprising that more than one phenomenon can be described with it.

I'm not real sure I understand the "zero universes" statement he's trying to 
assert either. Is he trying to say there are no particles, only 
entanglements, or something?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."

Post a reply to this message