> I've seen this method elsewhere
> (http://www.kuffner.org/james/gallery/raytracing/earth_from_space/), but
> what if I want to use spherical meshes for the Earth surface later on?
I don't think that would be a problem.
> Also using the mesh two times with a very small radial offset?
I had not thought of that. I think that your maths will get a bit more
complicated. As you rotate your terminator you will need to counter
rotate your night side sphere. For me, using a modeller, it is much
simpler having two concurrent spheres with one of them differenced with
a box.
But why a mesh? Surely the height difference between sea level and the
top of mountains is very small. Mount Everest is about 0.07% higher than
the average diameter of the Earth. Would that be visible at the height
of your camera? I think that the density of the mesh would need to be
very high to get acceptable detail.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|