|
 |
Em 12/05/2012 04:47, Le_Forgeron escreveu:
> Le 11/05/2012 23:46, nemesis nous fit lire :
>> andrel<byt### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>>> I've said it here before, there is no watertight definition of a 'man'
>>> and a 'woman'
>>
>> It's called a penis. If you got one of these, you're a man and is supposed to
>> put it to good use with someone who lacks it, hereon called a woman. If you
>> don't, you begin to whine and complain and try to legislate in favor of 2+2
>> being 5 or just getting rid of the damned thing...
>>
>>
> I'm afraid you have been misleaded by obvious criteria, which are plain
> wrong.
>
> Look at the old olympic ski medal of Erika Schinegger (1966, female,
> 1968 discovered internal male sex organs... )
>
> No penis.
>
> Even genetic classification (23th pair of chromosom for human: XX vs XY)
> is unreliable. There is also a few XXY, XXYY and XYY , how are you to
> call them ?
freaks. Should freaks be allowed to marry and be as miserable as
everyone else*? Sure, be my guest.
* adapted from a routine by comedian Chris Rock...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
