|
 |
Le 11/05/2012 23:46, nemesis nous fit lire :
> andrel <byt### [at] gmail com> wrote:
>> I've said it here before, there is no watertight definition of a 'man'
>> and a 'woman'
>
> It's called a penis. If you got one of these, you're a man and is supposed to
> put it to good use with someone who lacks it, hereon called a woman. If you
> don't, you begin to whine and complain and try to legislate in favor of 2+2
> being 5 or just getting rid of the damned thing...
>
>
I'm afraid you have been misleaded by obvious criteria, which are plain
wrong.
Look at the old olympic ski medal of Erika Schinegger (1966, female,
1968 discovered internal male sex organs... )
No penis.
Even genetic classification (23th pair of chromosom for human: XX vs XY)
is unreliable. There is also a few XXY, XXYY and XYY , how are you to
call them ?
(XXY frequency is about 1/800 along "male")
Post a reply to this message
|
|
