On 22/04/2012 8:52 PM, Orchid Win7 v1 wrote:
> On 22/04/2012 08:44 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 22/04/2012 6:44 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>> hmmmm ... nonads (well that's self explanatory) better yet faux-nads ...
>>> someone who thinks that gotta pair. OK I'll stop now ;-)
>>
>> I think, for everyone's sake, that you had better. ;-)
>
> Christ knows what happens if I ever try to explain group
> homomorphisms... o_O

LOL
And I think, for everyone's sake, that you had better not. ;-)

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message