|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 22/04/2012 08:44 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 22/04/2012 6:44 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>> hmmmm ... nonads (well that's self explanatory) better yet faux-nads ...
>> someone who thinks that gotta pair. OK I'll stop now ;-)
>
> I think, for everyone's sake, that you had better. ;-)
Christ knows what happens if I ever try to explain group
homomorphisms... o_O
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |