On 4/17/2012 9:07, Warp wrote:
> Invisible<voi### [at] devnull>  wrote:
>> For a start, F# is functional in the same way that C++ is
>> object-oriented. I.e., not very. F# is a normal OO language with a few
>> slightly functional ideas bolted on the side as an afterthought.
>
>    When will we see the Haskell# language?

I'm pretty sure the whole .NET bit is too OO to make that useful.There's way 
too much stateful stuff (like I/O) that you'd want to use from .NET to make 
it reasonable to have a purely function .net language.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "Oh no! We're out of code juice!"
   "Don't panic. There's beans and filters
    in the cabinet."

Post a reply to this message