> Kidding, but Adobe, among others, are *excellent* examples, imho, of
> what is wrong with *not* having cheaper versions, for people that need
> some of the functionality of a product, but can't afford the full blown
> Lear Jet version... Some day, I hope to have Rhino, but short of having
> it fall out of the sky into my lap, that isn't going to happen. I do
> have Photoshop now, but.. god was that a hit in the wallet. I would have
> been better off sticking with the "mostly" similar Paintshop Pro, or
> even trying to get Gimp to make some sort of sense. lol

I thought Adobe had their "elements" version of software to cater for 
the cheap consumer part of the market?

Post a reply to this message