> I wouldn't have expected the physical diagonal size to increase
> exponentially for obvious reasons, but you might have expected
> resolution to do so (if you assume "pixel rate" or something could
> double every 18 months, then the "dpi" should double every 3 years).
>
> The main problem is that Windows doesn't work nicely with higher
> resolutions.

/Windows/ doesn't support it? Or just that every 3rd-party crock of junk 
ported from Windows 3.1 or only tested on one PC assumes that everybody 
has exactly the same DPI?

Post a reply to this message