On 20-3-2012 14:22, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> It must at least be pre-1999, and somewhere in that decade iirc...
>
> Actually it was 1999 (and pre-me but I dug it up to read up on history):
>
>
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C371F0E2A.D04B8192@xs4all.nl%3E/
>
>
> Interesting thread ;)

I found that thread too but wondered if *that* was the original/earliest 
mention of it? It probably is.

Except for Mick Hazelgrove hinting at a photograph, nobody (in the 
thread) thought it was fake at the time? I am surprised. I do not 
remember my own thoughts back then... ;-)

Thomas

Post a reply to this message