On 17/03/2012 3:30 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mcavoys_at@aoldotcom>  wrote:
>>>     This is a private server owned by an individual person. It's this
>>> person's private property. This person can ban whoever he wants for
>>> whatever reason he wants.
>>>
>
>> Unanimously supported action?
>
>    So what? We are talking about law here, not about opinion, unanimous
> or not.
>
>    Just because people unanimously detest racist opinions doesn't mean
> they should be outlawed any more than eg. if people unanimously detested
> atheist opinions, or the opinions of the Westboro Baptist Church.
>
>    Everybody is entitled to their opinions, and the right to express
> one's opinions should be unalienable, no matter how much you hate those
> opinions. The moment we start banning certain opinions, we are entering
> a totalitarian form of government where thought crimes are criminalized.
> No thanks.
>

I have no problems with what you have said above. In fact I agree with 
your sentiments.
What I do have a problem with is: [Insert your preferred 
group/individual here] is not like us and lets go and kill them.

Free Speech would allow that.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message