On 04/03/2012 9:18 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>
>> BTW have you tried translucency = <0,0,0> end or 0.0001?
>>
> nope ... interesting idea. i've had better luck going in the other
> direction (larger values), but hey i'm still poking at this, so all
> ideas are good ones at this point ;-)

Not a good idea but interesting in a way.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message