On 04/03/2012 7:32 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> OK then ... I suppose it means that it's something I'm doing and NOT an
> anomaly. LOL ... back to the drawing board. Maybe it's the backside
> diffuse I'm using, at any rate thanks for helping eliminate one of the
> possibilities.

It was a very small area light, 4x4.
I'll post another test later, when it is finished, where I had to change 
the samples from 100 to 1000 when changing between RC3 to RC4.

BTW have you tried translucency = <0,0,0> end or 0.0001?

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message