Am 20.02.2012 20:51, schrieb andrel:

>> Right. If you read, the court already decided it's a case of negilgence
>> on the part of the dead kid, and not on the part of amtrack.
>
> This is a case where I don't care what an USAsian judge decides. ;)
> Technically he/she may decide that it is negligence, in real life it
> wasn't.

Crossing railroad tracks without looking?

Indeed, that's not negligence - that's plain stupidity.

Post a reply to this message