On 14-2-2012 1:13, clipka wrote:
> Am 13.02.2012 13:25, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>> I am still not sure about whether the bump sizes should be positive or
>> negative. I find positive values looking better in general but that
>> might be a wrong approach.
>
> Don't worry about it: You can't get it right anyway, due to a known
> problem with POV-Ray's implementation of UV-mapped image-based bump
> maps. Unfortunately, fixing it isn't exactly trivial.

Ah? Interesting to hear this. I hope (I know!) you will find a solution.

Thomas

Post a reply to this message