>>> no, it simply means MP4 does a way better job at compressing than DVD
>>> codecs...
>>> they are watching non-blurry HD streams, real-time.
>>
>> DVD is MPEG2. (?) I thought nobody had implemented MPEG4 yet.
>
> bluray is almost 6 years old already.

And? I used standard definition video as an example because it has more 
modest data rate requirements. If broadband is too slow for standard 
definition, it is /obviously/ too slow for HD.

> MP4 is almost already in every browser as part of HTML5 spec.

I also thought nobody has implemented HTML5 yet. (Hell, I thought they 
hadn't even finished /specifying/ it yet - not that that ever stopped 
anybody. :-P )

> see what you get for not reading slashdot feeds? You sound almost like a
> caveman!

Riiiight. Because if I visited Slashdot everyday I would already know 
all these things. Oh, wait...

Post a reply to this message