|
 |
nemesis wrote:
> Saul Luizaga<sau### [at] netscape net> wrote:
>> nemesis wrote:
>>> And what do you call one who looks at a joke and takes it seriously?
>>
>> I wasn't looking at the joke, obviously. So, how do you call a person
>> that thinks he can understand to another, who honestly fails to
>> understand a third, but fails, pretending to be smarter by diminishing
>> when he is as wrong as the one he pretends to correct?
>
> A cynic?
I think depends on the attitude, do wanted to be a cynic? or did you
wanted point out I was mistaken?
>>> Surely enough povray can render real reflections and GI with more than 1 bounce
>>> with radiosity -- though as the Crytek guys noted, 1 bounce is good enough for
>>> movies. For bonus with povray folks, you could even render a complete CSG
>>> Titanic made up from boxes and cylinders. But surely enough the video shows how
>>> amazing to be able to do it real time with graphics that look good enough
>>> running on off-the-shelf hardware rather than some renderfarm.
>>
>> Of course raytracing rendering will be superior, to real-time 3D GPU
>> rendering, at least until GPUs can raytrace.
>
> They've been raytracing, pathtracing and running other general computations for
> several years now already.
>
Well, I meant like POV-Ray does it but 24 fps at full HD 720p/1080p
screen resolution.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
