On 1/16/2012 8:11 AM, Invisible wrote:
> On 16/01/2012 12:36 PM, Tom Austin wrote:
>
>> We do have some methods to getting back up relatively quickly - tho they
>> are not instantaneous. Management is now willing to spend the money
>> where needed - tho I don't think we will go to fail-safe quite yet.
>
> Yeah, it's funny... I've noticed this strange correlation between
> expensive down-time and management willingness to invest in
> fault-tolerant equipment. ;-)

As we get more people and process more data - the more down time will 
cost.  Eventually we may get to higher uptime requirements - but for now 
2 hours of downtime 2x a year is not too bad.

Post a reply to this message