On 1/14/2012 9:34, Warp wrote:
> Darren New<dne### [at] sanrrcom>  wrote:
>> On 1/12/2012 9:45, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> Which, logically, means it can be trusted.  To be wrong, that is. :)
>
>> That's why I correct people who say Microsoft or Apple can't be trusted.
>> They can certainly be trusted to do whatever they can get away with.
>
>    I'd say that's rather nitpicky.

Yes. But it's usually in response to people complaining that Microsoft isn't 
trustworthy because they reliably do selfish things, or something. My point 
is "yes, rely on that rather than complaining of it."

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   People tell me I am the counter-example.

Post a reply to this message