|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 1/12/2012 5:52, Invisible wrote:
> Of course, if instead of inserting something obviously bogus, the person had
> made several small factual edits which look superficially plausible, you
It would take about an hour. You don't think academics do experiments like
this and publish their results.
> This is why Wikipedia will /never/ be inerrant. ;-)
Of course not. But it appears to have errors at about the same rate as
normal published paper encyclopedia.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
People tell me I am the counter-example.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |