On 10/01/2012 10:59 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 10/01/2012 11:10, Invisible a écrit :
>> I didn't say Jesus was real. I said he might be real. Some limited
>> evidence suggests he was real.
>>
>> ...or the entire thing might be a forgery from start to finish.
>> Interesting that there's only one version of that forgery, but it's not
>> completely implausible. I doubt we'll ever know one way or the other.
>
>
>  From the Roman documentation, at least the crucifixion did happened.
> It was a seditious Jewish man named Jesus

I also gather that "Jesus" was a fairly common name too. Like, if I sat 
down today and wrote a book about "John Smith", in 2,000 years' time 
historians are going to have one *hell* of a time figuring out whether I 
based it on a real person or not...

>  From where did he came, nothing is sure. Only the last 3 years of his
> life were dedicated to propaganda and sedition. It is also well-known
> that he frequented a whore (Marie Madeleine)... put that on the prudish
> and puritan Church. Coherency and consistency never make it inside dogma.

The Bible is inconsistent? SAY IT ISN'T SO! ;-)

Post a reply to this message