|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 15.12.2011 05:41, schrieb Alain:
> Here, adaptive have no effect.
> adaptive 1 start at 3 by 3
> adaptive 2 start at 5 by 5
> adaptive 3 start at 9 by 9
> ...
>
> area_light x*0.67 z*0.67 9,9 adaptive 2 circular orient only have a
> marginal advantage.
> adaptive 2 start to have a notable speed advantage at 17 by 17 and more.
>
Hmm, I'm not sure if I understand you correct. You mean using adaptive 2
makes only sense when using *more* than 5 by 5, right?
Actually I never did a serious speed/quality trade-off compare regarding
area_lights parameters and used more a "I guess this might work" and
alternatively a "better more than less" approach. Probably not a good
idea, so thanks for the head up.
-Ive
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |