>>>     That's not unicode. It's XML.
>
>> Perhaps you mean SGML? ;-)
>
>    I don't think that makes it non-XML.

Depends on your perspective.

XML is a subset of SGML, and therefore every XML fragment is also an 
SGML fragment.

On the other hand, nothing about the fragment specifically suggests XML, 
and not one of the multitude of over SGML subsets. In the face of such 
uncertainty, you might argue that describing it as SGML entails the 
fewest assumptions.

But now we're just splitting hairs...

Post a reply to this message