|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 11/29/2011 10:48 AM, Stephen wrote:
> On 29/11/2011 5:08 PM, Darren New wrote:
>> Machine guns are indeed highly regulated here.
>
> That sentence speaks volumes. ;-)
>
No, the fact that it can't be "auto", but can be "semi-auto", and thus
fire only 1/4 as many rounds in the same time, or something, is what
speaks volumes. The presumption is always that a) bad guys are never
going to find ways around it, b) they will never get their hands on
bigger clips, and c) 10 dead people isn't as bad as 30, or something...
In any case, the biggest bloody problems is that **time and time again**
its been shown that someone can walk into a private auction, or a gun
show, and *despite* regulations, pick up stuff, right there, when they
have a record of already using them to shoot people. Why? Because
special interest groups have "successfully" lobbied against blanket
requirements, that would deny someone the right to go to one of these
things, and walk out *with it*, having not gone through any of the
paperwork, checks, etc., that they would at a gun shop.
Highly regulated doesn't mean shit, if the regulations are not in force,
in some/all cases. They mean nothing, if there is a way to circumvent
them, which, short of remaking the gun so it can't even be modded back
into something more dangerous, isn't going to happen. Since such weapons
are a) supposed to be destroyed, b) not supposed to be available to the
public in the first place, and c) not "special made" in a civilian form,
uh... maybe there is also some sort of problem with the very fact that
people somehow end up with them *at all* in the first place?
Gun laws in the US are a damn mess, with so many loopholes that it is
absurd. And, most of those exist because a privileged few care more
about the "inconvenience" that they would suffer, if they worked, than
the wrong people ending up with them in the first place. Stupidly, its
often the same morons that want "more" freedom to buy what ever they
damn please, who want, at the same time, "more, longer, and stricter
punishments, for first, second, etc. offenders, in nearly all crimes",
with the seeming exception of circumvention of gun laws. You are more
likely to see some idiot get 3 years in jail for spitting on the
sidewalk in the future, than a drug dealer being denied a gun at a gun
exhibition, due to someone bothering to do an adequate check. They might
even sell it too them anyway, after they failed the check, then quote
some "private sale" loophole, or something, to justify it.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |