On 11/18/2011 7:55, nemesis wrote:
> problem is that you're trying to make java look worse than it is

Well, it's the way this particular project at google was written. But yes, 
making Java functional without lambdas is messy.

I went thru something like 300 classes in this particular hugely 
overengineered project and didn't find a single noun in the bunch of them. 
They were all stuff like "CustomerUpdater" and "StorageManagerImplementor" 
and such.  I think it comes from doing too much networking, since networks 
don't do a real good job of shipping objects around. I've been trying to 
introduce the team to the wonders of actually having the code and the data 
in the same class. :-)

> var z = from y select z where z.id = myID
>
> in it would be something like:
>
> List<OrganizationIndividualRelationshipEntity> y, z;
> for (OrganizationIndividualRelationshipEntity x : y)
> if (x.id = myID) z.add(x);

Yep.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   People tell me I am the counter-example.

Post a reply to this message