> On 15/11/2011 02:51 PM, Invisible wrote:
> Remember couple #453? One of the two that got 7 recommendations in round
> 1? In round two, they got 1455666, and therefore came last. Again,
> everyone thought they should be bottom, except for ONE judge. THE SAME
> ONE, incidentally. I wonder what the hell *she* was watching?
>

Welcome to the world of subjective points attribution...

> [I can only imagine she was standing at the other end of the room or
> something, and so she did see #453 and nobody else did, and she didn't
> see #466 and everyone else did. But man, that's some weird stats...]

Maybe it was an arrangement with the russian judge...

-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   gmail.com     */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }

Post a reply to this message