On 10/25/2011 22:43, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> The point being: there are indications of some things out there that are
> suspicious, and can't be explained

Good so far...

> but the logical conclusions are this and that... etc.

If they can't be explained, how can you call your conclusions "logical"?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   People tell me I am the counter-example.

Post a reply to this message