Warp wrote:
> Saul Luizaga<sau### [at] netscapenet>  wrote:
>> And because something can't be explained it
>> doesn't mean is not indication something is going on, you need to open
>> your mind to toher possibilities and stop that attitude "Give me facts
>> or give me death!", you're like the ignorant which hunters, only seeing
>> what you want to see, science and nothings else.
>
>    Being open minded to alternatives does not mean automatically *accepting*
> those alternatives. One should accept explanations only if there's sufficient
> evidence for them, not just because someone came up with them.
>
>    Believing something just because somebody tells you so is not
> open-mindedness. It's gullibility.
>
Why you misinterpret what I say? I'm not saying you must accept what I'm 
saying, I'm saying is logical to see that there are indications that 
there are things that seem to go beyond our everyday world, that 
probably will be explained in a future when we develop more technology.

Is not about is true or false, you should stop seeing things that way 
because this is not science, is a big gray area for now, but logic on 
the indications presented may be the most probable cause, that's it.

If you could see the series you'd see that respected physicists that do 
teach in universities talk about it, if fun to imagine the 
possibilities, and to be part of what others have lived as a 
extraordinary experience that marked their lives, risking and sometimes 
being ridiculed, but what choice they have? it was their experience and 
nothing can change that; if you see the series you'd understand better 
what I'm trying to say, because I don't believe everything either but 
some parts yes, others I doubt them and a few are not likely to me 
specially since I learned that some are complete hoaxes like Lazard.

Post a reply to this message