|
|
On 10/16/2011 20:18, Jim Henderson wrote:
> I cited a counterexample, and you changed the criteria.
Yes. I clarified. Why, are we keeping score?
> They do indeed. I'm sure they could work out a licensing arrangement for
> "approved by Microsoft" software if they wanted to, and take a cut for
> distribution.
>
> Apple does, after all.
Well, as I said, so does Microsoft.
Say, here's an idea. Why don't you go work for Microsoft and explain to them
why they're losing so much money? :-) I mean, seriously, why are you
arguing to *me* that Microsoft should be offering this service for a fee?
> So, that can happen on both Linux and Windows. I'm not sure what your
> point is.
My point is that in spite of how I'm interpreting your claims, Windows does
indeed have "software management elements" in their OS and supporting software.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
How come I never get only one kudo?
Post a reply to this message
|
|