|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/13/2011 0:17, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> In fact, I think that of these four jobs, the acting is possibly the least
> important. It needs to be adequate, and good acting will of course elevate a
> film, but I find that once the acting is above a certain quality threshold, it
> makes little difference to my enjoyment of it.
I think it depends to a large extent on the type of film, at least for me. A
"chick flick" sort of film with bad acting is much worse than a blow-crap-up
film with bad acting. :)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
How come I never get only one kudo?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |