|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 13:15:28 -0700, Darren New wrote:
>>> Oh, tremendously. But they're still a PITA compared to Windows'
>>> explorer, methinks.
>>
>> Depends entirely on what you're used to.
>
> I expect there are some areas where you can definitely say "this feature
> is better implemented than that feature", and a bunch where it's much
> more important what you're used to.
>
> But I think it's safe to say that having three different copy/paste
> buffers and having each program decide which key combination to use to
> address each one is inferior to having one copy/paste buffer
> consistently implemented, for example.
Sure, and I'd agree with that as well.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |