Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> On 30/09/2011 05:38 PM, Darren New wrote:
> > On 9/30/2011 8:32, Warp wrote:
> >> That list prominently lacks the crucial concepts of control(led testing)
> >> and peer reviewing.
> >
> > There's plenty of that. Co-students mocking you, and the teacher grading
> > you. ;-)

> Whereas in *real* scientice, it's other eminent scientists who mock you...

  That's the whole point. If your results stand up to that kind of
scrutiny, you're a winner. (See eg. the paper named "100 authors against
Einstein".)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message