On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:17:59 +0100, Invisible wrote:

> On 29/09/2011 01:31 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:59:07 -0400, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>
>>>> Anybody wanna take a stab at what frigging year that is??
>>>
>>> 1994 is what you meant, but that's not what you wrote. ;)
>>
>> But 1103 is what you wrote, at least according to one converter I
>> found.
> 
> I think you'll find that what I wrote is invalid, and hence has no
> defined value.

Well, yes, that's what I found - but the converter I found actually came 
back with a value.

>> MCMXCIV is what you were trying for. ;)
> 
> Hmm... 1994... So I was 14? Yeah, that would explain why I was stupid.
> >_<

I would say "young and inexperienced".  Unless you still think that's a 
valid value? ;)

Jim

Post a reply to this message