On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:59:17 +0100, Stephen wrote:

> On 26/09/2011 11:25 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> But it should not just be in OT, where it will disappear shortly.
>> So, you're saying it's OT for OT?  (I think it's fine here, it's not
>> explicitly about POV-Ray).
> 
> No, I am saying that it is too good to disappear. It should be kept for
> prosperity.

OIC, that's certainly true.  :)

Jim

Post a reply to this message