On 26/09/2011 11:25 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>> But it should not just be in OT, where it will disappear shortly.
> So, you're saying it's OT for OT?  (I think it's fine here, it's not
> explicitly about POV-Ray).

No, I am saying that it is too good to disappear. It should be kept for 
prosperity.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message