Mike Raiford <"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/26/2011 10:57 AM, Warp wrote:

> >    At the time I liked them, and none of the arguments that were made back
> > then against them sounded very convincing. It just sounded a lot like people
> > were complaining because of "they changed it, now it sucks" and other
> > nostalgia filtering reasons rather than *actual* ones.

> Everything can be summed up as follows: Jar Jar Binks.

  I still disagree on that one.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message