On 9/19/2011 1:16, Invisible wrote:
> efficiency of that system over a low network link ought to be the number one
> priority.

Uh, no.  VNC was *specifically* designed to be trivial to implement at both 
ends.

> If I'm remote-controlling a system, I don't really care how easy
> it is to implement the wire protocol; I care whether it *works* well.

Except you aren't the person who designed VNC. You're the person who should 
be using RDP or maybe X-Windows, or NeWS, or any of the other dozens of 
remote graphics solutions.

>> Show me X-Windows ported to a javascript client.
> Why would you want to do that?

Ask the guys who wrote VNC, which runs in a web browser too, you know.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   How come I never get only one kudo?

Post a reply to this message