Le 2011-09-19 04:16, Invisible a écrit :
>>>> VNC wasn't really designed for efficiency.
>>>
>>> The fail!
>>
>> Nope. It was just designed to be easy to implement instead of being
>> efficient.
>
> If you're designing a system to control other systems remotely, the
> efficiency of that system over a low network link ought to be the number
> one priority. If I'm remote-controlling a system, I don't really care
> how easy it is to implement the wire protocol; I care whether it *works*
> well.
>
>> Show me X-Windows ported to a javascript client.
>
> Why would you want to do that?

Because it would be fully buzzword compliant.

-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   gmail.com     */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }

Post a reply to this message