On 16/09/2011 05:20 PM, Darren New wrote:
> On 9/15/2011 3:12, Invisible wrote:
>> (Which is /obviously/ what I asked in the first place, to anybody who
>> actually understands how evolution works.)
>
> The problem is that the actual answer to your question is "mu", the
> answer that unasks the question. The very question you're asking is
> nonsensical, so no amount of disclaiming the phrasing of it is going to
> get you a reasonable answer. I.e., you're asking the wrong question, and
> people are picking on your wording to try to illustrate that the very
> concept behind the question is nonsensical.

*sigh* In Wales there exists at least one field which contains at least 
one sheep, at least one side of which is black. :-P

Would it make you happier if I asked whether the poisonous compounds are 
primary or secondary metabolites? Because that's clearly what I'm 
asking. :-P

Post a reply to this message