>>> VNC wasn't really designed for efficiency.
>>
>> The fail!
>
> Nope. It was just designed to be easy to implement instead of being
> efficient.

If you're designing a system to control other systems remotely, the 
efficiency of that system over a low network link ought to be the number 
one priority. If I'm remote-controlling a system, I don't really care 
how easy it is to implement the wire protocol; I care whether it *works* 
well.

> Show me X-Windows ported to a javascript client.

Why would you want to do that?

Post a reply to this message