|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 2011-09-16 04:30, Invisible a écrit :
>
> With NAT, it can work perfectly well. At long as each endpoint knows the
> other only by its publicly routable IP address, anyway.
Correction: as long as both endpoints know each other by an address that
works for them.
I know of customers who do inbound natting of third party servers as
well, because they don't want to route the public IP range inside their
network.
> There are probably web servers that run on RFC-1918 IP addresses.
I would wager that the vast majority of them do.
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* gmail.com */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |